Its mediocrity guarantees this lavish, soggy retread of futuristic Australian action classic 'The Road Warrior' a place in the ranks of forgotten extravaganzas. Ah well.Despite these negative comments, I still like this film and watch it occasionally. Not to mention that normal air becomes toxic beyond a certain depth. Someone obviously never told the writers that air compresses under pressure, so her little diving bell's supply would have been compressed down to a bubble probably not much bigger than her head. A lot easier.Finally, we had him taking Jean Tripplehorn down into the murky depths to show her a drowned city.

Then we had Kev Costner distilling fresh water out of his own urine? What's wrong with all that sea water he's floating on? No ammonia to get rid of there, for a start. For a start, the opening sequence depicts the world completely flooding when the ice-caps melt - I don't think so. When you go to see a movie like this you shouldn't expect too much in the way of realism in some aspects (remember Armageddon?) but it was perhaps unfortunate that, at the time this movie came out, I was teaching SCUBA diving.As an instructor you learn certain basic facts of physics regarding the sea which perhaps took the edge off this film's impact. It's an enjoyable enough action-flick, and much underrated. The best you can hope for is to be entertained in this type of film, and I think it delivers quite nicely. You really can't measure a films worth by its budget. I guess I just liked the spirit of this movie, enough so to give it a 7/10 stars. I wonder if he has as much fun playing the characters more based in reality in the lower-budget, more independent films he's been doing the last few years as opposed to the larger than life bad guys he's played earlier in the nineties (no doubt the catering is better on the big budget action flicks). The guys a riot, I always look forward to him as the nasty one. And ya gotta hand it to Hopper, he really throws himself into his villain roles. Costner gives the standard Costner performance, which isn't bad if that's what you like (personally, I kinda like him, but at the same time I've never had to work with him). Its story actually more resembles the sequel to Max, The Road Warrior (anyone who has seen it will recognize many of the plot elements). It's been called 'Mad Max on water', although it's much less grim than Max. But it's fun sci-fi, with the emphasis on the fiction more than the science part.Yes, Waterworld is not without its faults, but it is still a decent enough adventure flick. It has some cool ideas, but few that stand up to any real scrutiny. Waterworld is filled with some interesting stunts, including a few things that I've never seen in film before. If the movie's good, it's good, if it's bad, it's bad, it doesn't matter what the budget is. Could someone explain to me why critics suddenly become accountants whenever a movie causes a stir in Hollywood because of its budget? I'd really like to know where that comes from. I say surprising' because with all the hype that surrounded this movie before its release, it got blasted by critics who seemed to focus more on the movies budget (it had the largest one for its time) than the actual film itself. Meanwhile, a girl with supposedly a map to get to dry land tattoo-ed on her back, is the objective for an attack by a gang of smokers who attack the atoll. When they find the Mariner to be a mutant they sentence him to death. The Mariner sails his trimoran over the seas, drinking his own Urine and visits a floating atoll of 'Drifters'. People are few and far between, living in small communities at sea or sailing from one to another as traders. A5c7b9f00b Sometime in the future, the polar ice caps have melted and the world's oceans and seas have covered the land.

Waterworld the movie download